Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 50,000.

If the above fine is not paid, 25,000 won shall be converted into one day.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaged in driving a taxi vehicle B.

On September 3, 2017, around 18:20 on September 3, 2017, the Defendant left the three-lanes in written cross-sections from the camping bridge located in Macheon-dong, Busan, and changed the course to the four-lanes before C. D.

No driver of any motor vehicle shall change course when it is anticipated to impede normal traffic of other motor vehicles running in the direction to which he/she intends to change his/her route.

Nevertheless, the defendant has changed the course from the three lanes to the four lanes only, and has been straighted in the four lanes.

The E Operation interfered with the normal passage of the FObane.

Summary of Evidence

1. CCTV and black stuff images (under the above evidence, according to the defendant's assertion, it is recognized that the defendant changed the course from the third lane to the fourth lane on the street obstacle display section in which the change of course is prohibited prior to the beginning of the time and place of the criminal facts in which the defendant changed from the third lane to the fourth lane on the street obstacle display section in which the change of course is prohibited, and that the defendant moved to the right side of the taxi operated by the defendant.

However, as long as the Defendant entered a four-lane road and passed through, it is found that, first, after closely examining the situation of the lane in which the Defendant wants to change course, the Defendant changed course to the four-lane road, as stated in the facts constituting the crime, even though he did not interfere with the passage of the Otoba in the instant case, it was recognized that he interfered with the passage of the Otoba in the instant case, and that the Defendant entered a four-lane from the road obstacle display section where the change of course is prohibited.

The application of the statute is not different even if it is not different).

1. Article 156 subparagraph 1 of the Road Traffic Act and Article 19 (3) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

2. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

3. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

4. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment.