1. Defendant A’s imprisonment for one year, Defendant B’s imprisonment for eight months, Defendant C’s fine of two million won, and Defendant D’s fine of one million won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a unemployment owner who operates a “H game site” on the second floor of the building located in Jincheon-gun G in Chungcheongnamcheon-gun, and Defendant B is a management officer who manages customers in the above game site. Defendant C, Defendant D, Defendant E, etc. are employees who play a role in heart, cleaning, exchange, etc. in the above game site, and I, J, and K are employees who performed a role in soliciting customers by publicizing the above game site.

No one shall provide for the distribution or use of, or display or keep for, a game product which has not been rated by a meeting of the game water grade members, or exchange, arrange for exchange, exchange, or repurchase any tangible or intangible result obtained through the use of the game product, or engage in a business of purchasing such result, or engage in a business of speculative acts by using slot machines or speculative gaming machines, other than speculative business.

Nevertheless, at around March 13, 2016, Defendant A employed Defendant B, Defendant C, Defendant D, Defendant E, Defendant I, J, and K in the above game site. Defendant A managed the operation of the entire game site, Defendant A recruited customers by promoting the above game site, and Defendant B, Defendant C, and Defendant E, etc. provided 40 points of “highly new game products”, which are a speculative machine that was not classified by the said game site from the Board of Rating Board members, to customers who found the above game site, and paid points that they acquired through the use of the above game in cash after deducting 10% of the points obtained through the use of the game in exchange for money.

As a result, the Defendants provided ungraded game water in collusion with I, J, K, etc., and exchanged results obtained through the use of game water, and conducted speculative activities using speculative gaming machines as a business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Defendants: