logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.03.27 2018고단7024
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 12, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around July 8, 2012, at “C” in the second floor of the Defendant’s operation of the Cheongju-si building B, Cheongju-si; (b) “A house in Seoul, which is owned by Seoul, is 120 million won prior to 12,000 won prior to 12 years; and (c) it is difficult to raise the deposit; and (d) the amount of the deposit is no longer than 12,000 won; (b) the amount of the deposit was paid within 3 days prior to her change. Before her change, the Defendant wanted to refund the deposit for the deposit before her change and show the amount of the deposit for the lease to 35 million won; and (c) the tenant would receive the deposit for the lease of the deposit for the lease of 35 million won prior to her change to her age of 500,000,000 won.”

However, in fact, the defendant had a large personal debt so that he can pay his personal debt with the money received from the victim, and there was no intention or ability to pay it normally to the victim.

On July 12, 2012, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 35 million won from the victim’s wife E account from the victim’s wife E to the G Association account (H) in the name of Defendant’s wife F, and acquired it by deceiving the victim.

2. Around August 16, 2012, the Defendant was guilty of KRW 50 million on August 16, 2012, at the same place as the above 1st of August 2012, 2012, stating that “Around October 5, 2012, another lessee would enter the same place as the victim, such as the foregoing 1st of August 12, 2012. Around the occupancy, and around October 5, 2012, there was a false statement that the father would have not paid personnel expenses. If the Defendant borrowed KRW 50 million to be used as personnel expenses, then the Plaintiff would have received the deposit for the deposit for the deposit for the lease of KRW 35 million prior to the repayment.”

However, in fact, the defendant borrowed money from the victim for the same reasons as the above 1.

arrow