logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.08.29 2018고단119
상해
Text

[Defendant A]

1. The sentence against the accused shall be 2,000,000 won;

2.Provided, That this judgment has become final and conclusive.

Reasons

Defendant A (Defendant A) was in the vicinity of the new construction site of “D” located in Gunsan-si, Masan-si on June 15, 2017, and there was a dispute regarding the holding of a meeting around that time in the vicinity of the new construction site.

The victim F(43) who is affiliated with the E Trade Union, expressed the victim the victim's photograph "hyp fec fec fec fec fec fec fec fec fec fec fec fec fec fec fec fec fec fec fec fec fec fec fec fec fec fec

Summary of Evidence (Defendant A)

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

2. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect B;

3. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

4. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the evidence, report on reading materials, and medical certificate of injury respectively (Defendant A);

1. Relevant Article 257 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

2. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution [The details and degree of injury of this case, and the fact that the injured person after agreement with the injured person does not want the punishment of Defendant A (including submission, etc. on August 23, 2018)];

3. The part concerning the dismissal of a public prosecution (Defendant B) under Articles 70(1) and 69(2)(1) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act in a workhouse (when a sentence of suspension of execution is invalidated or revoked, a fine shall not be paid).

1. The facts charged No. A is the chapter H in North Korea before the G Trade Union, Defendant B is the vice-chairperson of the E Trade Union, and Defendant A and Defendant B were the issues of holding a meeting in the vicinity of the “D” new construction site located in Gunsan-si C.

Defendant

B around June 16, 2017, around 07:20, at the vicinity of the due diligence of the construction site, there was a dispute over the holding of an assembly around that time.

spiting spiting spiting spiting on the face of the victim A(44) who is a member of the G trade union

In the direction of the victim's face, 500ml bottled the victim's face by spreading water on the victim's face.

2. Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts charged of judgment: The crime of non-violation of intention under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act is after prosecution is instituted.

arrow