logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.07.04 2017고단1273
상표법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

A. The Defendant is a person operating an Internet shopping mall “C” in Daejeon-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon-gu, and 501.

On July 13, 2016, the Defendant: (a) posted the said “C” bulletin board; (b) no one may infringe on another’s trademark registration; (c) placed the victim’s siren, Pene ENTO registered with the Korean Intellectual Property Office on February 1, 2011; and (d) placed the said “ROCSUD” sign with the same or similar name as the “RPPPUD” mark; (d) the “PPPPPUUUUUD” mark * PPUUUUUUUUUUUUU * PPPUUUUU * PPPUU * PPUUUU * PPUUUU * PPUUUU * PPUUU * PPUUU * PUUUUUUG * PUUUUUG * PUUUUUUG * PUUUUUUUUG *

Accordingly, the defendant infringed the trademark right of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Complaint;

1. Photographss of a C-site screen closure;

1. Application of statutes on trademark infringement details

1. Article 230 of the relevant Act on criminal facts and Article 230 of the Trademark Act (a comprehensive selection of fines);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is confession, reflection, first offense, and damage, resulting from which the defendant's sales profit was low, and shopping mall business is low.

arrow