A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 25, 2017, the Defendant assaulted the victim E (18 taxes) in the above restaurant on the ground that the Defendant, in front of the D’s restaurant located in Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon, on the ground that the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, boomed on the floor of the boomer, was boomed by the victim E (18 taxes). On the other hand, the Defendant boomed the victim’s Handphone on the glass door, thereby shouldering the victim with a glass window so that it can be protruding.

2. The Defendant damaged property, at the same time, at the same time and place as described in paragraph 1, one word box placed on the way, at the same time and place as described in paragraph 1, was collected toward the cafeteria glass window in the restaurant as described in paragraph 1, which is operated by the Victim F (n.e., age 47), and damaged the Pool glass box so as to cover the repair cost of KRW 3 million.

3. At the entrance of the restaurant as described in paragraph 1 at the same day-to-day radius as described in paragraph 1, the Defendant who interferes with his/her business refers to “I am dyphhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Does we see whether a doggs want to sing;

Dr. Dr. C. H. L. L. C.

If you want to do so, I expressed a desire to friend it, and received a large amount of vision, and interfered with the operation of the cafeteria by force of the victim F by avoiding a disturbance between about 20 minutes of the disturbance by using a large sound.

4. When the Defendant: (a) was arrested as a flagrant offender under suspicion, such as interference with light duty 2:20 on the same day as indicated in paragraph (1), the Defendant damaged public goods to use the public goods so that it could not be discovered by breaking the back door of the patrol patrol vehicle in the Southern Daejeon World War, and breaking it to the left end of the patrol vehicle in the course of the patrol vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. E statements;

1. A report on internal investigation:

1. Investigation report (investigation into the situation of dispatch to the scene);

1. On-site and damaged photographs;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 141(1) (a) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) (a) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) (a) of the Criminal Act, Article 260 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for the crime;

1. Article 37 of the Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes Act.