The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (one year of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the defendant recognized each of the crimes of this case and reflected against the defendant, and that the injured person does not want punishment against the defendant by agreement with the victim is more favorable.

However, in full view of all the circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, background of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court is deemed to be appropriate and it cannot be deemed to be unfair because it is too too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s argument on the sentencing of the instant case is groundless, on the grounds that the sentence of the instant case is deemed inappropriate, since it is deemed that the sentence of the lower court is deemed to be reasonable and too unreasonable, in so doing, the Defendant’s argument on the sentencing of the instant case is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.