1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the following order for payment shall be revoked, and above.

1. The reasons why the cited party members of the judgment of the court of first instance explain this case are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal as set forth in the following paragraph (2). Thus, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of

2. Parts to be dried;

A. From 4th to 14th sentence of the first instance trial, the Defendant’s liability is reasonable to regard the Plaintiff’s fault as 40% with respect to the occurrence of the instant accident as 3,197,247 won [29,20 won for future treatment expenses of KRW 3,438,00 for future treatment expenses of KRW 1,595,525] x 60%] considering that the Plaintiff’s standards set up by the Plaintiff B and C, which caused the instant accident, was not involved in the establishment of the location of goods, such as standards or beds, etc.

B. From 5th to 13th of the judgment of the court of first instance, the defendant is obligated to pay damages for delay calculated at the rate of 5,197,247 won to Plaintiff A (i) and 3,197,247 won (i.e., 3,197,247 won consolation money 2,000,000 won) and to this end, from 20th of December 20, 2014 to 25th of September 2015, 2015, which is the day following the day when the copy of the application for amendment of the purport of this case is served, it is reasonable for the defendant to pay damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from the day following the day when the judgment of the court of first instance is rendered, which is 5th of September 25, 2015, which is 20% of the amount of the defendant's obligation to pay to Plaintiff B and C as 1,000 won per annum from 25th of the judgment.

3. Conclusion.