logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.01.12 2016고합783
마약류관리에관한법률위반(마약)등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.

However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are not importers of narcotics.

1. Defendant A

A. A. Around May 2015, the Defendant received marijuana from B without compensation in the Defendant’s car parked in the window of the underground owner of the Gangnam-gu Seoul G G building in Gangnam-gu, by means of drying the marith of marijuana.

B. On December 31, 2015, the Defendant received marijuana from B, without compensation, in a passenger car parked at the places specified in the preceding port of the Republic of Korea.

(c)

On July 20, 2016, the Defendant smoked marijuana in a passenger car parked in Soyang-gu H in Soyang-gu, Soyang-gu, Hongyang-gu by attaching a fire to the fluent quantity of marijuana and inhaleing the smoke.

2. Defendant B

A. At the time and place specified in paragraph 1(a), the Defendant accepted marijuana in a way that receives the marith of hemp free of charge from A, as seen above.

B. At the time and place specified in Paragraph 1(b), the Defendant received marijuana in a way that receives the marith of hemp free of charge from A, as above.

(c)

On May 2015, the Defendant smoked marijuana in a manner that inhales it by attaching the smoke to the influent quantity of marijuana at his/her home located in the said G building 1307.

(d)

On December 31, 2015, the Defendant smoked marijuana in such a way as to inhale the smoke by putting the smoke in an influence of the hemp at his own residence.

E. On May 2016, the Defendant used cocars, who are narcotics, in a manner of inhaleing cocars into cocos at a place in the fore of red bean.

F. On June 2016, the Defendant used cocars who are narcotics in a manner of inhaleing cocars as soon as possible at the places inside the red bean.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Partial statement of the witness B (limited to the defendant A);

1. Protocols of police seizure and list of seizure;

1. A letter of narcotics appraisal (B/Ma) and a letter of narcotics appraisal (A/B);

1. Existing existence of each of subparagraphs 1 through 4 of the evidence; and

1. Each investigation report (calculated with a surcharge) [Defendant B].]

arrow