1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part concerning Defendant Incorporated Foundation B and Defendant C in the judgment is modified as follows:

1. The facts below the basis facts are either in dispute between the parties or in the entries or images set forth in Gap evidence 1 (including the paper number; hereinafter the same shall apply). It shall be admitted in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings.

[1] The plaintiff is the church that the deceased J is the father of G, and the mother of K is believed to be one of his mother.

Defendant B is a broadcasting business entity that produces and broadcasts the program called “E” as a broadcasting station based on the lingoology.

Defendant C is an Internet broadcasting business entity that operates Internet re-transmission services for Defendant B’s broadcast content through the website (F) and “G” website (G).

Defendant D is a reporter working for Defendant B and Defendant C.

[2] Defendant B, as the title “L” in the “E” program (attached Form 3), made a broadcast coverage and report by Defendant D (hereinafter “instant broadcast”) as the title “L”.

Defendant C around I, posted the broadcast content of this case on the F’s website and “G’s website,” and provided a new Internet service for the content of the broadcast.

2. (1) The broadcast content of this case is as shown in attached Form 3, and among which the broadcast content of this case is reported by Defendant D, there are the following contents:

I returned to and returned to the O religious organization only three years from home and returned to us.

The husband eventually is bound to bring a divorce lawsuit against the wife.

As such, the victims of the inter-spe groups, such as MM religious organizations and N.O. religious organizations, P religious organizations, Q. Religious organizations, etc., were punished for a combined assembly at a distance.

They pointed out that they are leaving the government of any non-governmental group which leads to social crimes by destroying their families, exercising intimidation and violence.

I argued that the clear illegal act under the positive law has not been properly investigated.

They use a religion and commit illegal acts. They are only enforcement of the law that the government and the prosecution have provided for.