logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.07.08 2019가합35834
정정보도 및 손해배상 청구
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an incorporated association aimed at investigating the case of infringement of human rights in North Korea. Defendant B is a terrestrial broadcasting company that produces and broadcasts “G” program as a terrestrial broadcasting company that broadcasts “F” (hereinafter “instant program”). Defendant C is an Internet multimedia broadcasting company that reports general news and current news programs.

(hereinafter referred to as “stock company” is omitted from the name of the company. Defendant D is the chief of Defendant B, and Defendant E is the PD produced of the instant program.

B. On April 22, 2019, Defendant B rendered the instant broadcast “H” (hereinafter “instant broadcast”) in the instant broadcast program, and Defendant C thereafter provided a new broadcast service of the instant broadcast on its website (I).

The source of the article that North Korean residents consume 30% of the drugs is essential.

(A) A’s organization cites a report and reports the content of the debate.

(A) The actual condition of the consumption of narcotics by North Korean residents. The person who prepared the report is JA researcher.

(A) draw up a report with 18-in-depth interview among 467 visitors. In light of the report, at least 30 per cent of the estimated value of the J Research Institute, at least 30 per cent of the estimated value of the J Research Institute, at least 18 in-depth interviews presented on the ground that at least 30 per cent of the North Korean residents use narcotics.

(A) Does there be no problem even if this 18 talks about this 18 visitors are generalized into the North Korean society as a whole.

On the other hand, the instant broadcast contains the following contents:

(hereinafter referred to as “instant report”). 【No dispute exists, Party A’s entries in Gap’s 1 through 3, and 5 certificates (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), images, and the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion that Defendant B and C infringed the Plaintiff’s reputation by openly expressing false facts on the instant report.

Therefore, Defendant B and C are press reports.

arrow