logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.01.29 2015나2032729
정정 및 반론보도, 손해배상 등
Text

1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

Defendant B Co., Ltd. shall have seven days from the date when this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

1. The facts below the basis facts are either in dispute between the parties or in Gap evidence No. 1 (including a serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply). It shall be admitted in full view of the purpose of the entire pleadings.

[1] The plaintiff is the church that the deceased J is the father of G, and the mother of K is believed to be one of his mother.

Defendant B is a newspaper enterpriser who issues “L” as a company engaged in the business of publishing and selling newspapers.

Defendant C is an Internet newspaper enterpriser who reports comprehensive news in operating the Internet homepage (H).

Defendant D is a reporter working for Defendant B and Defendant C.

[2] On April 10, 2014, Defendant C posted an article written by Defendant D (hereinafter “instant article”) under the title “I” on the news page of the Internet homepage (attached Form 1) as shown in attached Form 1.

On April 11, 2014, Defendant B posted the instant article on the 30 pages of the E News Act.

2. Demand for a corrective report and counterargument report;

A. The contents of the article of this case (attached Form 1) are as follows. Among them, the article of this case is as follows. PO pointed out that “The reason why MM religious organizations are more dangerous than Q religious organizations is likely to frequently present the birth, divorce, child abuse, and renunciation of custody.” (2) The Plaintiff’s assertion that the Plaintiff did not assert the end-of-age theory of the Plaintiff, and there is no fact that the Plaintiff’s birth, divorce, child abuse, and waiver of custody frequently appeared due to the end-of-age theory of the time, and there is no fact that the Plaintiff’s birth, divorce, child abuse, and waiver of custody frequently appeared.

A corrective report, such as attached Form 2-1, shall be filed against Defendant B (attached Form 2-1), and a corrective report, such as attached Form 3-1, shall be filed against Defendant C.

Preliminaryly, he/she shall seek a counterargument report such as attached Form 2-2 against Defendant B (attached Form 2-2), and seek a counterargument report such as attached Form 3-2 against Defendant C.

3) Determination A) Claim for a corrective statement (1) the text and text of the foregoing part of the instant article.

arrow