logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2020.03.26 2019고단4701
사기등
Text

The defendant shall be exempted from punishment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 15, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and two years and six months for fraud at the Daejeon District Court on December 27, 2018, and the above sentence became final and conclusive on December 27, 2018.

When the Defendant was her wife, living expenses, etc., the Defendant was her husband, and the Defendant did not receive the loan under the name of B without permission of B, and asked C, who sold the mobile phone to obtain the mobile phone loan from the Defendant at the time, to the effect that “I want to obtain the mobile phone loan from her husband B, and I want to make the mobile phone loan from her husband, and I want to promptly pay the mobile phone sales proceeds to her husband D, and C accepted it again.

1. On November 12, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around November 12, 2015, at the F University G campus located in Sejong Special Self-Governing City, provided that C with a mobile phone in the name of the Defendant located in Sejong Special Self-Governing City, the Defendant provided D with a telephone phone in the name of the Defendant for a loan of three million won as her husband B; and (b) provided D with a telephone call for a loan of three million won as if her husband B; and (c) sent the form of the loan transaction agreement from the said victim company to J, which is a facsimile number of nearby phrases, via C.

Then, D indicated “3,00,000 won” in the loan limit column, “3,00,000 won” in the first use limit column, “3,00,000 won” in the contract date column, “12 November 12, 2015,” “33.4% per annum in the expiry date column,” “34.9% per annum in the overdue interest rate column,” “K” in the resident registration number column, and “B” in the customer name column, and submitted the said loan transaction agreement to the Defendant via C by facsimile.

As a result, the Defendant, without authority, has forged one copy of the loan transaction agreement in the name of B for the purpose of exercising the right, and the victim H Co., Ltd. is deceiving the victim H Co., Ltd. as above and used by the Defendant from the above victim Co.

arrow