Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 15, 2012, at around 23:10 on May 15, 2012, the Defendant threatened the victim E (nex, 44 years of age) with the expression “to delete a video file on a three-time-time-time-time-time-time-time-oriented-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-

2. Indecent acts by compulsion;

A. On May 23, 2012, around 23:30, the Defendant had a talk about the above victim before the National Bank of Korea in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, and took the victim on the Defendant’s vehicle, and committed an indecent act by force against the victim by using sparing and raising the victim.

B. On May 16, 2012, around 00:30 on May 16, 2012, at the 385-dong underground parking lot of Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City apartment complex, the Defendant took the victim on the Defendant’s vehicle, and committed an indecent act by force against the victim by sparing and raising the victim

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Record of seizure, the site of seizure and the photograph of seized goods;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to prepare and report sound recording materials and stenographic records at the time of intimidation and indecent act;

1. Article 298 and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 283 (1) of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant asserts that there is no fact that the victim had committed indecent act by force against the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

In light of the above evidence, the victim made a statement from the investigative agency to the investigation agency on May 16, 2012 at the request of the defendant who had consistently continued to do so, and on the same day, the victim made a statement that the victim did not come to the victim and resisted to the victim by sparing the victim and sparing the victim in the vehicle. As above, the victim's statement that corresponds to the above facts charged is consistent and consistent.