logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.02.09 2016고단3653
사기미수
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 14, 2014, the Defendant, at the 2nd floor office of the “E Industry History” operated by the Defendant in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S., U.S., on May 14, 2014, carried out an “E Industry History” game using the card Chapter F, G, the victim H, and the victim I, with each other’s card Chapter 52, and the following numbers and shapes are different.

From 20:30 to 22:30 of the same day, the Defendant prepared and used the so-called “ab card” that may distinguish the number and type of the card from the back of the card while making the said “E industry company” game more than 30 times in total with the victims, and tried to acquire money from the victims by deceiving the victims as if he used the normal card, and by deceiving them as if he used the normal card, the Defendant attempted to use the betting money. However, even though the Defendant did not know the fact that the victims used the “ab card” to use it, the Defendant did not go through the wind and attempted to do so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness H, I, J, and K;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officer in G;

1. Statement by the police concerning L;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. A criminal investigation intelligence report, internal investigation report, and investigation report;

1. Detailed statement of savings deposit transactions, transfer screen, request for investigation cooperation, processing of reported cases, recording records, copies of bankbooks, and data on analysis of telephone conversations;

1. The Defendant asserts that there was no fraud by using the so-called “Ba Card,” and rather, the victims,J, etc. prepared a wood card in advance to receive a mutual agreement from the Defendant, and that the Defendant was deprived of fraud.

According to the above evidence, the following facts can be acknowledged:

(1) On the day of the instant case, the Defendant, victims, F, and G, etc. were gameed with the unconstitutional card, and there was a set of TV.

arrow