A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Seized evidence 1-17 No. 1-17 shall be confiscated from the accused.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a business owner who operates the E Game Chapter in the Heak-gu D and the third floor in the Goak-gu.

No one shall provide information on the distribution or use of a game product with a content different from that of a game product classified by a game product rating member's meeting, or display or store such for such purpose.

From June 15, 2015 to June 17, 2015, the Defendant: (a) attached outside storage devices (USB) and radio communication cameras (radio receivers) to 40 games, which were classified as rating members in the above game in the above game room from around June 15, 2015 to around the 17th of the same month; and (b) provided a large number of unspecified customers with a game product different from the rating classification by implementing an ster.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of F and the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Each protocol of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on response as a result of appraisal;

1. Article 45 of the relevant Act on criminal facts and Articles 45 subparagraph 4 and 32 (1) 2 of the Act on the Promotion of the Alternative Game Industry (Selection of Imprisonment with labor);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act, Article 44(2) of the Game Industry Promotion Act [the scope of recommended punishment] [the scope of punishment] No. 1 of the basic field (from June to one year and two months), such as the use and provision of illegal game water (the use and provision of game water different from the classification of rating] [the decision of sentencing] [the crime of this case requires strict responsibility in that it undermines sound work awareness.

In addition, even though there are circumstances in which the crime of this case was committed by a large number of people and organized, the defendant is trying to do so, and the defendant has committed two times before and after the same fine.

However, in consideration of the short period of crime, the age, sex, environment, motive, means and result of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment shall be determined as ordered within the scope of recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines.