The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal by the defendant and his defense counsel (misunderstanding of facts) is that he was aware that he was negligent in studies due to Internet game addiction, and that on May 30, 2016, E remains for a long time in the bus stops in the bus stop, he was able to listen to the fact that on May 30, 2016, E was called in the house, and E was sprinked as being sprinked once, and there was no physical abuse by assaulting the head, bucks, and clothes of E, such as the statement in the facts charged.

Nevertheless, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment by finding the Defendant guilty of the facts charged on the grounds of the testimony of E without credibility.

2. 판단 원심 및 당 심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정할 수 있는 다음과 같은 사정들, 즉 ① 피해자 E은 이 사건 당일 112 신고를 받고 출동한 경찰과 경찰서에 동행하여 조사를 받으면서 “ 이 사건 당일 피씨방에 들어온 아빠가 내가 앉아 있던 의자를 발로 차고 나의 머리를 주먹으로 때리고 발로 허벅지 부분을 두 대 찼다.

The her mother and the her mother and the her mother and the her mother are towed out of the broad, and the head of the bridge is continued to run towards the bus stops by driving the her mother and the her mother is faced with the head in the bus stops.

폭행을 피하려고 계속 뒷걸음질 쳤는데 아빠가 따라와서 나의 배를 발로 두 세대 정도 걷어찼다 ”라고 진술하였는바, 위 진술은 구체적이고 일관되어 신빙성이 있고, 피해자가 친부인 피고인에 대하여 허위로 진술할 만한 특별한 사정을 찾아볼 수 없는 점, ② 피고인은 경찰 조사를 받으면서 “ 이 사건 당일 피해자를 찾으러 피씨방에 갔다가 피씨방 안 의자에 앉아 있는 피해자를 보고 화가 나 피해자를 발로 찬 사실은 있다....