logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.11.05 2020고정376
절도
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On September 29, 2019, at around 16:45, the Defendant: (a) stolen the purchase between the victim D (23 years of age) who was the immediately preceding employer at the 15th place of “CPC (hereinafter “CPC”) located in Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu Northern-gu” (hereinafter “the instant CPC”).

2. The victim, at the investigative agency and the court of law, went to the country of this case by using bus or taxi on the day of this case, and after paying transportation fees to the country of this case, he had a card tag. Since it is clear that the card tag has been under the right side of computer monitors, it is also clear that the card tag was lost. Thus, according to the letter of order to submit financial transactions to E and F by the court of this case to the effect that the victim used the card of this case on the day of this case, the settlement details of the "F" and the "G" did not include the payment details of bus or taxi charges. Even in the video CD in which the card tag of this case was taken, the victim was placed under the right side of computer monitors by leaving the card tag of this case, or the defendant's card tag of this case, and there is no other reliable evidence to acknowledge the remainder of the facts charged by the prosecutor in light of the following facts.

3. In conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of criminal facts, and thus, a judgment of innocence is rendered pursuant to the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, but the summary of the judgment is not publicly announced pursuant to the proviso of

arrow