logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.11.28 2017누62237
이행강제금부과처분취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: (a) the "owner" of the first instance judgment No. 6 is the "owner" (the plaintiff A and E share 1/2 shares); (b) the "three households" of the first 10 is the "five households"; (c) the "five households" of the first 11 are the "five households"; (d) the "one 12" is the "Procedures"; (e) the "Plaintiff" of the first 17 is the "Plaintiffs"; (e) the "A" of the second 20 is the "households"; and (g) the "A" of the third 1 is deleted as the "owner"; and (e) the "building No. 1" of the third 8 and fourth 4 of the Housing Act is the "Act No. 14" of the Housing Act as well as the "Act No. 14" of the Housing Act; and (e) the "Act No. 4) is the "Act No. 1" of the Housing Act as well as the "Act No. 17.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims of this case should be accepted in its reasoning. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow