A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

around 03:00 on June 9, 2016, the Defendant: (a) confirmed that the victim D was not in contact with the studio cudio-gu Seoul Special Self-Governing Province; and (b) subsequently, 4.60,000 won in cash stored in the container box in the vehicle after a year from the vehicle’s door to September 21, 2016, the Defendant stolen the victims’ property by the same method five times in total from around that time to September 21, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. Each statement of D, H, I, and J;

1. A criminal investigation report (victim counterpart investigation), a criminal investigation report (CCTV video recording data), a criminal investigation report (examination related to the market price), a criminal investigation report (related to the identity of a suspect), a report on occurrence of a theft incident (the investigation of a victim and his/her surrounding CCTV in the scene), a report on the occurrence of a theft incident (the investigation of a victim and his/her surrounding CCTV in the scene), a report on the occurrence of a theft incident (the confirmation of the card user),

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to detailed statements of the use of cards, such as each CCTV-cape photograph;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The aggravated punishment for concurrent crimes under the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (an aggravated punishment for concurrent crimes against a victim J with the largest punishment for larceny);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Consideration of favorable circumstances among the following grounds for sentencing);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: Imprisonment with labor for one month to nine years;

2. Scope of the recommended sentences according to the sentencing criteria;

(a) Crimes Nos. 1-3: Each category of larceny [Determination of Type] (No person who is subject to special sentencing] (decision on the territory of recommendation]; the basic area of larceny (decision on the scope of recommendation] (decision on the scope of punishment); six months to one year and six months;

B. Final scope of sentence: 6 months to 2 years: Imprisonment (i.e., 1/2 maximum of crime No. 2 maximum of crime No. 3)

3. In this case, vehicles shall be vehicle at the latest, or at the new wall time, of the defendant several times.