A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Criminal facts

On May 18, 2018, the Defendant found that there was no correction of the door of E, the victim D, who was parked in the road, around 12:37, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S.A., the Defendant: (a) opened a door; (b) 50,000 won in cash, which was kept in the custody box of the object; and (c) ran out KRW 1.8 million in cash, which was kept in the custody box of the object; and (d) from that time, from that time as described in the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes.

6. From 15:00 on three occasions until 26.15:00, the sum of KRW 16.5 million owned by three victims by the same method was carried out within the vehicle owned by the victims, and each theft was stolen.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of F, D, and G;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Each report (thief), 112 report sheet, 8 copies related to the case, 112 report of the case, 20 copies of the report of the case, 112 report of the case, three copies of the report of the results of field identification, and nine copies of the report of the category of the suspect at the scene of the crime;

1. Each internal investigation report and the application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing each investigation report;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Grounds for sentencing under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the same Act, as the punishment for concurrent crimes;

1. The scope of applicable sentences by law: Imprisonment for one month to nine years; and

2. Application of the sentencing criteria;

(a) Class 1 or 3 of the Act on thief for the thief for the thief for the thief for the thief for the general property (a type of decision): Two types (general thief for the thief for the general property); - The area of mitigation of mitigation [decision in the sphere of recommendation] of mitigation [the scope of recommendation] from April to October / [the scope of suspended sentence] - The major reasons for suspended sentence for the stief for the stief for the st

(b) The result of the increase in the final scope of sentence by multiple offenses (No. 1/2 of the upper limit of crime No. 2 of the upper limit of crime No. 1/3): April to June 10:

3. As well as the above sentencing factors, the Defendant committed a crime of larcenying and stealing the property of approximately KRW 400 million in total prior to the instant case, three years of suspension of execution on November 4, 2014.