logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.12.23 2013구합2957
토지수용이의재결처분취소 등
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 2,262,250 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 5% per annum from October 23, 2013 to December 23, 2014.

Reasons

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business approval and public notice - Business name: General industrial complex development projects (general industrial complex development projects) - Public notice: Defendant on December 16, 201: Gyeonggi-do public notice No. 2011-5162, May 17, 2012; Gyeonggi-do public notice No. 2012-133, May 201:

B. Adjudication on expropriation made by the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal on September 10, 2012 - Expropriation date: November 8, 2012: ① Land subject to expropriation compensation: ① Land subject to B 1,062 square meters, ② C 1,963 square meters, ③ D 798 square meters (hereinafter referred to as “instant land” in the sequence of sequence 798 square meters; ② Land subject to expropriation compensation and farming compensation - Compensation 216,30,280 won (= Land compensation 57,348,000 won (= Land 106,000 won)); ② Agricultural compensation 11,484,280 won (hereinafter referred to as “the instant land”)

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on an objection made on August 22, 2013 - Compensation for the instant land: 218,506,750 won (i) land Class B: (ii) land 114,737,350 won, land Class II: 114,737,350 won; and (iii) farming compensation - An appraisal company: a new appraisal corporation in the future of a stock company (hereinafter referred to as “the Corporation”); a company for appraisal (hereinafter referred to as “the Corporation”); a company for appraisal (hereinafter referred to as “the Corporation”); and a “appraisal” in the case of a referring to both the future and future; hereinafter referred to as “the grounds for recognition”); the fact that there is no dispute; and the purport of all pleadings 1 through 6; and 1 through 5 (including any number of evidence available); and the purport of all pleadings)

2. The assertion and judgment

A. On January 1, 201, the Plaintiff’s assertion, appraiser, and the Plaintiff’s appraisal appraisal panel (hereinafter “court appraiser”) based on the result of the commission of appraisal by this court (hereinafter “court appraisal”) calculated the price of the instant land by comparing the E field 1,554 square meters with the comparative standard land at the time of strike, and by comparing the public announcement of the project approval (on December 16, 201) as of January 1, 201, prior to the public announcement of the project approval (on December 16, 201), the time adjustment, regional and individual factors, and other factors, the price of the instant land was calculated, but the instant land was calculated based on the amendment.

arrow