1. The defendant,

A. The Plaintiff A’s KRW 82,820,000 and the annual rate from July 7, 2012 to September 13, 2016, respectively.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business name 1) Public notice of the recognition and public notice of the business: G road establishment 2): The public notice of Gyeonggi-do public notice of April 16, 2007 H, Gyeonggi-do public notice of the Second Gyeonggi-do Public notice of September 9, 2010, and the third operator of the Gyeonggi-do public notice of March 28, 2013: the Gyeonggi-do public notice of the Gyeonggi-do public notice of Gyeonggi-do.

B. On July 6, 2012, July 13, 2012, 2012, the date of acquisition through consultation with the owner of the land subject to acquisition through consultation, Plaintiff 1,731 square meters in K prior to the date of acquisition on July 6, 2012, Plaintiff 3, on July 13, 2012, Plaintiff 24 square meters in Mju-si, Pju-si, Plaintiff 356 square meters prior to the date of acquisition through consultation, Q2,344 square meters in Q2,50 square meters prior to the date of Plaintiff 2,385 square meters prior to the date of Plaintiff 2,385 square meters prior to the date of Plaintiff 385 square meters, 1,993 square meters, Plaintiff 3, Apr. 11, 2007; on July 28, 2011, Plaintiff 1,356 square meters prior to the date of acquisition through consultation;

The plaintiffs filed an application for adjudication on the remaining land and on July 16, 2015 by the Central Land Tribunal for adjudication, claiming that the price of each land indicated in the table below the remaining land was reduced. However, the Central Land Tribunal dismissed the plaintiffs' application on June 25, 2015 on the ground that there was no decrease in the price of the remaining land on July 16, 2015 on the basis of each appraisal result of the On-the-Land Appraisal Corporation composed of the appraisal base point at the time of appraisal standards and E-the-Land Appraisal Corporation.

The details of the remaining land of the Plaintiff 1: (a) Plaintiff 1: (b) Plaintiff 2,010 square meters of 1,010 square meters prior to W; (c) Plaintiff 2, 232 square meters of 232 square meters prior to B; and (d) Plaintiff 4, 262 square meters of 1,109 square meters prior to B; (c) Plaintiff 5, Zin-si, Pri-si, Pri-si, AB-si, AB-si, 63 square meters of 63 square meters; (d) Plaintiff 6, Pri-si, Pri-si, Pri-si, AB-si, 414 square meters of 414 square meters; and (e) Plaintiff 8, Pri-si, Pacific-si, 2085 square meters of 211 square meters prior to AD; and (e) the purport of the pleading including evidence No. 250 square meters prior to Pri-si, 388 square meters prior to Pri.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiffs' land subject to the plaintiffs' assertion and acquisition is incorporated into the project area of this case, and the price of the remaining land in 1,2,5,6,8,10,11, and 12 in the above remaining land (hereinafter "each of the above land") is the same.