logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.06.18 2017고정3360
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

A person who intends to run a business providing youth games of the 2017 High 3360 " shall have facilities and register with the competent authorities.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not make the above registration and provided a juvenile game service by installing one unit of “crain game”, which was classified as “A” in Seocho-gu Seoul, and “D” on the front side of the “D,” and which was classified as “A” to provide it to many and unspecified persons.

The defendant of "2017 Highly 3361" is a person with a disability with delay.

Around 00:00 on September 1, 2017, the Defendant, at the second basement parking lot underground of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan building E, demanded the victim F-si straw straw straw straw straw straw straw straw straw straw straw string string string string string string string string string string string string string string string string b

Summary of Evidence

"2017 High 3360"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Reporting on detection;

1. Photographs " 2017 High 3361";

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Photographs of the victim's body;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to wheel chairs photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 45 subparagraph 2 of the Act on the Promotion of Alternative Game Industry (hereafter referred to as the "Juvenile Game Industry without Registration"), Article 26 (2) (hereafter referred to as the "crime of violence"), Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The judgment of the defendant and his defense counsel on the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order is that the defendant and his defense counsel only move the wheelchairs in the future for the defendant to enter his house, and there was no intention to assault the victim with wheelchairs.

However, the circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, namely, the situation at the time when the defendant and the injured person were in a trial, and the defendant.

arrow