logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2020.02.12 2019나13306
소유권이전등기
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant (appointed parties) are dismissed.

2. The appeal by the plaintiff out of the costs of appeal.

Reasons

1. Attached Forms 3 and 4 shall accept the attached Forms 3 and 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and each “DA” in Attached Form 4 shall be replaced by “W” respectively.

The reasoning for this part of this Court is that the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the alteration as follows.

No. 13 of the judgment of the court of first instance is replaced by the "this Court" in the 4th sentence to the "Yacheon District Court Support".

Part 14 of the judgment of the first instance is replaced by the Defendants of the first instance court (the part against the Defendants of the first instance court among the judgment of the first instance became final and conclusive).

2. The reasoning for this part of the judgment by the court regarding the main defense of the Defendant (Appointed Party) is the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

3. Determination (1) on the merits: The reasoning for the judgment on the merits is as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for deletion as follows. Thus, this part of the real estate subject to prior lawsuit is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Part 16 of the first instance judgment of the court of first instance, "the defendant," shall be deleted.

4. Determination (2) on the merits: The reasons for this part of the real estate title No. 45 are the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the alteration or addition as follows. Thus, this part of the judgment is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The term "Defendant AG" is replaced by "Defendant AG of the first instance trial" in the 17th judgment of the first instance.

No. 18 of the first instance judgment, the Defendant’s “Defendant” was replaced by “Defendant (Appointed Party)”.

Part 5 of the first instance judgment, Part 5, “Defendant B” was replaced by “Defendant B,” “Defendant G,” “Defendant G,” “Defendant G,” “Defendant N,” and “Defendant N,” “Defendant N,” respectively, into “Defendant N, of the first instance trial.”

In the first instance judgment, the first instance judgment No. 20 is followed by "Naaa".

arrow