1. All appeals by the plaintiff (appointed party) are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Appointed Party).

1. The grounds for this part of the basic facts are as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance, except for the alteration, deletion, or addition as follows. Thus, this part of the basic facts is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Documents of the first instance judgment

1.(a)

2) Paragraph (2) is replaced by “2) Defendant C was the president of the Defendant Union on December 11, 2016, and D was the director of the Defendant Union on December 23, 2016.”

In the first instance judgment, the part of the judgment of the court of first instance No. 4, 18, and 19, “The defendant union shall be requested to supplement data several times from June 5, 2018 to August 1, 2014, and deleted.”

Nos. 4, 20, and 5 of the first instance judgment are as follows: (a) “The opinion has been presented, but the opinion has been reviewed as one of its own opinions,” and (b) changed into “the first instance judgment.

In the fifth sentence of the first instance judgment, "AF" is replaced by "K".

On the 6th page of the first instance judgment, the following information shall be added.

E. On June 3, 2019, the Defendant Cooperative announced the transfer of the instant apartment reconstruction project.

Part 6 of the first instance judgment "1, 3, and 4" is replaced by "1, 3, 4, and 11."

2. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance, except for the change or deletion as follows. Therefore, this part of the reasoning is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Documents of the first instance judgment

2.(a)

1) Paragraph (c) of the same Article refers to a contract that imposes a burden on the members of the instant commercial building, and the modification of the management and disposal plan concerning the sale of the instant commercial building cannot be seen as a minor modification, and thus constitutes a resolution by the general meeting under the Urban

Although the defendant union was subject to the resolution of the 71st council concerning the sale in lots and the modification of the management and disposal plan of the commercial building in this case, the resolution of the board of representatives cannot replace the total resolution, and it did not have any quorum for the resolution of the board of representatives.

Therefore, the instant service contract and.