beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
(e).
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2018 Highest 1475"
1. On February 25, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 11:20 on February 25, 2018, in the distribution of the third floor of the Cridge in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s worship by inserting a confluence by inserting approximately 100 of the members of the D and several times in the roads where he/she is towing with approximately 100 of the members of the D, and demanding that D would be able to be able to be able to be able and harmful to the Defendant; and (b) as the said D demanded that D would be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be imprised to D’s response, such as the sound of the D and the members of the said D church for about 20 minutes.
"2018 Highest 3536"
2. From April 1, 2018 to April 1, 2018, the Defendant, from around 11:20 on April 1, 2018 to around 12:07 on the same day, sent approximately 80 towing times to D and teachers, a pastor at the three-story wedding room located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the case charged is included in the facts of interference with worship.
However, the CD recorded on the same day and the recording thereof are as follows: ① there are many other persons’ answers to the horses of a pastor or a believers that reads the saman’s sexual intercourse; ② there is a custom of response to the Defendant at the same time with the Defendant; ② there is a sexual intercourse that the saman transferred by the saman to the saman; ③ there is no case where the saman’s response can be made by the saman, etc. as seen above, and the case where the saman’s response can be made by the saman, etc.; ④ there is no case where the saman’s response can be made by the saman, etc., and the case is not determined by the saman’s religious rites; ④, although the Defendant appears to have a saman’s autonomy during the saman’s religious rites, most of them are when the saman ends, and there is no objective hindrance to the Defendant’s understanding of the contents.