(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.05.22 2019고정871

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.05.22 2019고정871

철도안전법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 20, 2019, at around 19:00, the Defendant: (a) reported to the effect that, in the waiting room of the third floor of the Korean War C in Seoul, the Defendant was fluored with a dispute and body fighting; (b) the Defendant visited the Korean Railroad Police Center together with the Defendant, and reported to D that “the Defendant was assaulted by the Defendant” to a special railroad judicial police officer in the said place.

Accordingly, when the defendant asked questions about the circumstances of the case against the poor names of D, the defendant sent the D's chests one time by hand and tights twice.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the performance of duties of railroad workers by assault.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police in relation to D (victims and arresters);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes that capture CCTV image data at the scene of a crime, such as a copy of the name of the victim special judicial police officer, a photo of the damaged part, a photograph of the place of crime and arrest, a criminal investigation report (the CCTV case at the scene of

1. Articles 78 (1) and 49 (2) of the relevant Act on the Safety of Railroad Safety, the selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for sentencing order under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include the nature of the instant crime and the degree of tangible power the Defendant has exercised, the fact that the Defendant appears to be against the recognition of the instant crime, and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, surrounding environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and all the conditions of sentencing as shown in the instant pleadings, including the circumstances after the crime

참조조문

유사 판례

-전주지방법원 정읍지원 2020.05.21 2020고단110

-수원지방법원 2015.08.26 2015고단2629

-서울중앙지방법원 2014.08.20 2014고정1548

-청주지방법원 2020.10.22 2019고단2970

-전주지방법원 2020.01.07 2019고단1202