logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2020.04.29 2019구단11034
국가유공자및보훈보상대상자비해당결정처분취소
Text

1. On March 13, 2019, the Defendant’s decision that the Plaintiff was not eligible for veteran’s compensation is revoked.

2...

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 8, 2017, the Plaintiff entered the Army and completed military training on July 17, 2017, and served on July 17, 2017, and was discharged from military service on November 5, 2018.

B. On July 2, 2018, the Plaintiff sustained an injury while undergoing the education for public quarantine at a special technical school on July 6, 2018, and was expelled from the school on July 6, 2018, and was diagnosed by B Hospital on July 9, 2018 (hereinafter “the instant injury”). On July 17, 2018, the Plaintiff received an operation “after half-yearly anti-months and flaging”.

C. On November 5, 2018, the Plaintiff discharged the instant injury from active service on the grounds of surgery and the subsequent obstacles, and applied for registration of a person eligible for veteran’s compensation on the grounds of the instant injury on November 5, 2018. However, on March 13, 2019, the Defendant: (a) confirmed that the symptoms continued without any special credit to recognize that “the past past ability of the left-hand knee was verified and that a sudden disease occurred after entering the hospital; (b) as a result of the review of the film materials of B Hospital, it is difficult to recognize that the Plaintiff’s compensation order does not meet the requirements of Article 2(1)2 of the Act on the Support for Veteran’s Compensation for Veteran’s Compensation for Veteran’s Compensation for Veteran’s Compensation for Veteran’s Compensation for Veteran’s Compensation for Damages on the ground that it was difficult to recognize that the records confirming that the Plaintiff was in the state of the left-hand sle part of the surgery and the outer part of the disease.”

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 12, 14, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 4 (including virtual numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The plaintiff's assertion is accompanied by a knee-free knee-free kne-free feng in the past So-gu Practice Do, which is a half-month feng in the outer side of the city.

arrow