1. On October 17, 2013, the disposition that the Defendant rendered against the Plaintiff as a person eligible for veteran’s compensation is revoked.

2...

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On June 9, 2006, the Plaintiff was discharged from military service on October 31, 201, while serving as a noncommissioned officer at the Three B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B of the Army.

B. On January 208, 2013, the Plaintiff was discharged from active service, and was diagnosed by the Defendant on August 26, 201, that “Around January 2008, the Plaintiff sustained an injury from the left-hand knee-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-out kne-free kne-free kne-out kne-out kne-out kne-out kne-out kne-out kne-out kne-out kne-out kne-out kne-out kne-out kne-out kne-out kne-out kne-out kne-out (hereinafter “the instant injury”). On August 24, 2011, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration with a person eligible for veteran’s compensation and a person eligible for veteran’s compensation.

C. On October 17, 2013, following a resolution of the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement, the Defendant rendered a decision on whether the Plaintiff constitutes a non-conformity of the requirements for a person of distinguished service to the State under the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Service to the State (hereinafter “instant first disposition”) and the Act on the Support for Persons Eligible for Veteran’s Compensation (hereinafter “Act on the Compensation of Persons of Distinguished Service to the State”), on the ground that “The circumstance leading up to confirming the identity of the person of distinguished service in the instant case is not confirmed, and is determined as a sedi disease in the operation record, and there is no proximate causal relation between the two in the instant case, such as confirming the ability to receive treatment of the person of distinguished service to the State,” and notified the Plaintiff thereof.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap's 1, 2, Eul's 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether each of the dispositions of this case is legitimate

A. The plaintiff's assertion is the first time on the left-hand knee in the Daejeon-gu training.