logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1980. 5. 27. 선고 79누40 판결
[관세·특관세·물품세부과처분취소][공1980.7.15.(636),12885]
Main Issues

The meaning of "collection" under Article 23 of the Customs Act

Summary of Judgment

The term "collection" in Article 23 of the Customs Act means only the collection procedure of consultation.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 23 of the Customs Act

Reference Cases

Supreme Court Decision 74Nu25 delivered on May 28, 1974

Plaintiff-Appellee

Attorney Kim Jong-soo, Counsel for the defendant-appellant

Defendant-Appellant

Head of Busan Customs Office

Judgment of the lower court

Daegu High Court Decision 76Gu75 delivered on January 30, 1979

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal by Defendant Litigation Performers are examined.

The judgment of the court below is just in light of the facts without dispute and legitimate evidence that the non-party 2 was liable for duty payment, and the non-party 1 and the non-party 2 were not liable for duty payment on the non-party 1 and the non-party 2 were not liable for duty payment on the non-party 1 and the non-party 2 were not liable for duty payment on the non-party 1 and the non-party 2 were exempted from duty payment on the non-party 1 and the non-party 1 were exempted from duty payment on the non-party 1 and the non-party 2's non-party 2's non-party 1 and the non-party 2's non-party 2's non-party 2's non-party 1 and the defendant's non-party 5's non-party 2's non-party 2's non-party 1 and the non-party 3's non-party 1 and the non-party 5's non-party 1 and the non-party 2's non-party 1 were subject to tax collection on the non-party 17.

The paper is without merit.

Therefore, this appeal is without merit. The costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Jin- Port (Presiding Justice)

arrow