1.The judgment of the first instance court, including the claims extended by this court, shall be modified as follows:

The plaintiff 1.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the victim of the two traffic accidents as follows. The Plaintiff is the victim of the first traffic accident E E Uidi A6 vehicle in the first traffic accident (hereinafter “victim”).

(1) Non-Party K3’s driver and Non-Party K3’s car (hereinafter “K3’s car”).

(2) Defendant B is the owner of the vehicle comprehensive insurance, and at the same time the insurer of the vehicle comprehensive insurance for the damaged vehicle and the damaged vehicle and the K3 vehicles are in the status of the insurer under each comprehensive insurance contract (including non-insured injury) for the damaged vehicle for the first traffic accident.

3) On April 23, 2015, Defendant C is the perpetrator of the second traffic accident and Defendant D is the user of Defendant C. (b) On the first traffic accident, Nonparty G was driving a sea-related vehicle on the first line road located in Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, U.S. on April 23, 2015, with the entrance of the J parking lot located on the left-hand side while driving it on the first line, Defendant C left the left-hand left-hand left-hand left-hand after moving the vehicle on the left-hand side of the harming vehicle in the same direction, and by negligence, the harming the damaged vehicle going beyond the center line on the left-hand side of the harming vehicle in the same direction, and caused the shock by which the harming vehicle proceeds to the left-hand side of India.

hereinafter referred to as "the primary traffic accident".

(2) As a result, the Plaintiff, who had driven a damaged vehicle, sustained injuries, such as catitiss, which require two weeks’ medical treatment. 2) The Plaintiff was in charge of repairing the damaged vehicle caused by the primary traffic accident, and Defendant C, who had been employed by Defendant D, did not look at the right before and after the operation of the damaged vehicle on the street in front of the Cheongju-gu K Park located in the Cheongju-gu, Cheongju-si, on June 22, 2015, the part of the Plaintiff’s bridge part on the back of the damaged vehicle, which was in the rear side of the damaged vehicle due to the negligence that had been driven in order to deliver the damaged vehicle that had been repaired on the street in front of the Cheongju-gu, Cheongju-gu, Cheongju-si, to the Plaintiff

(c).