logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원진주지원 2019.04.05 2018가단30166
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The defendant,

A. The Plaintiff A’s KRW 39,145,917 and its related KRW 5% per annum from August 13, 2017 to January 23, 2018.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. (1) On August 5, 2017, Plaintiff A purchased the E E E E’s car (hereinafter “instant damaged vehicle”) from D to “the operator who is liable for all accidents that occur from the time when the automobile was taken over” and purchased the purchase price of KRW 25 million (2.5 million on the contract date, the down payment 2.5 million on August 16, 2017, and the remainder 2.5 million on the contract date).

Plaintiff

A paid the down payment to D on the same day and received the said vehicle.

Meanwhile, the plaintiff A, along with the plaintiff's spouse B, operates an orchard in the F of Dong-dong, Gyeongnam-gun, Gyeongnam-gun.

(2) G is the driver of the I QM5 Motor Vehicle owned by H (hereinafter “instant Maritime Vehicle”). H concluded a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance contract with the Defendant, the insurer, with respect to the said Maritime Vehicle.

B. At around 10:20 on August 12, 2017, G was driving the instant Maritime Vehicle, along the two-lanes at a point of 375 km from the border road located in Pyeongtaek-ri, Dongcheon-ri, and the previous vehicle was rapidly parked in the vehicle due to the vehicle’s engine, and the previous vehicle was changed to the three-lane, while discovering the damaged vehicle in the instant case where the vehicle was driven in the three-lanes, and plucked to the left-hand left-hand side of the said damaged vehicle, but the vehicle was found to have been driven in the three-lanes, but it was not possible to find the damaged vehicle in the instant case where the water was driven in the three-lanes, and the part was shocked by the front-hand side of the said damaged vehicle.

In the future, the above Maritime Vehicle, which was pushed ahead of the J, has moved back to the right edge of the above Maritime Vehicle, and there was a conflict with the above Maritime Vehicle among the vehicles in front of the left side due to the first shock, while the Maritime Vehicle in front of the Maritime Vehicle in front of the left side and being pushed ahead of it.

(hereinafter the above traffic accident is referred to as “instant accident.” The Plaintiffs suffered injuries, such as the soft and scarcity salt, which require medical treatment for each of three weeks due to the foregoing accident.

[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 21, Eul evidence 3 and 4 (Provisional number.)

arrow