1. The Defendant: KRW 3,043,200 to Plaintiff A; KRW 3,916,80 to Plaintiff B; and each of them, from August 15, 2015 to February 2, 2017.

1. With respect to Plaintiffs E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N,O, and P, the ruling of recommending reconciliation was finalized on December 1, 2016. A.

Project approval and public announcement - Project name: C Housing Redevelopment and rearrangement project (hereinafter referred to as "project of this case"): Defendant - Public announcement of project implementation authorization: Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government public announcement of April 11, 2013

B. Decision on expropriation made on June 26, 2015 by the local Land Tribunal of Seoul Special Metropolitan City: - Land on August 14, 2015 - Each of the land indicated in the column for “real estate” in attached Table 1 (hereinafter referred to as “land in this case”) - Compensation: Attached Table 1, the term “appraisal of expropriation” in the attached Table 1 is the same as the indicated in each item. - An appraisal corporation: Sam Chang Chang Corporation and one appraisal corporation.

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on January 21, 2016 - Compensation: The phrase “the result of the appraisal” in the attached Table 1 attached Table 1 is as follows - An appraisal corporation: Adod appraisal corporation, a dialogue appraisal corporation and a stock company (hereinafter “objectd appraiser”) (hereinafter “objectd appraiser”); the above appraisal is “an appraisal of objection”; and the result of the appraisal is “the result of the appraisal of objection”; there is no dispute as to whether there is a ground for recognition”; the entries in the attached Table 1 through 4, 6, 7, and 2 (including each number), each statement in the attached Table 1, each statement in the attached Table 1, each statement in the attached Table 1, and the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The appraisal result of the plaintiffs' assertion of objection is unfair by evaluating the land of this case excessively low and thus the defendant should pay the difference with the reasonable compensation to the plaintiffs.

(b)as shown in Appendix 2 of the relevant statute.

C. 1) The project area of the instant case is located near Qudong, that is, the area adjacent to the area of the instant project, and is a typical residential zone where there are neighborhood living facilities in part on the roadsides.

B. The instant land is accessible to most of the land except for a part of the land according to a relatively organized road.