1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 10,384,00 for Plaintiff A; and (b) KRW 8,905,300 for Plaintiff B; and (c) for each of them, from April 18, 2015 to December 12, 2016.

1. The instant lawsuit was initially filed by the Plaintiff 9, and the decision of recommending reconciliation was finalized on November 24, 2016 between Plaintiff E, F, G, H, I, J, K and the Defendant.

Approval and Public Notice of Project - Project Name: C Housing Redevelopment rearrangement Project - Defendant - Public Notice of Project Implementation Authorization: D Public Notice of Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on April 20, 201

B. The date of expropriation on February 27, 2015 - The date of expropriation on April 17, 2015: The land to be expropriated as indicated in the attached Table 1 (hereinafter referred to as “instant land”) shall be specified as the parcel number, and the individual land shall be specified as the parcel number. The Plaintiffs seek an increase in the amount of adjudication compensation only for the portion of the land in the compensation items. The Plaintiffs are omitted from the entry of the “date of appraisal of expropriation” in the attached Table 1.

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on March 24, 2016 - Compensation: The phrase “the result of appraisal” in the attached Table 1 attached Table 1 is as follows - An appraisal corporation: a national appraisal corporation; a new appraisal corporation in the future of a stock company (hereinafter “Objection”) (hereinafter “Objectioned appraiser”; the above appraisal is deemed as a “Objectioned Ruling”; and the result of the appraisal is “the result of appraisal of an objection”; the fact that there is no dispute on the grounds of recognition / [the grounds of recognition]; the entries in the attached Table 1, 2, 6, 9 through 12 (including each number); and the purport of the entire pleadings;

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The appraisal result of the plaintiffs' assertion of objection is unfair by evaluating the land of this case excessively low and thus the defendant should pay the difference with the reasonable compensation to the plaintiffs.

(b)as shown in Appendix 2 of the relevant statute.

C. 1) The instant land is located near the northwestwest of the subway M Station 3, Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seoul, and the Dorogate, which is located near the instant land, is on the scale of 2 to 3.