Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

While operating ‘D Co., Ltd.', the Defendant received a new construction of the F4th warehouse building from the complainant E at Kimpo-si.

On November 29, 2013, the suspect appeared as a witness of the lawsuit claiming construction cost, 2013Kahap6253, which was claimed against the complainant, and testified after making an oath.

1. The Plaintiff’s agent’s “Defendant (Appellant E), while staying at the construction site, demanded construction other than the original design and suspended the progress of construction work, and the Plaintiff’s agent presented the modified design drawings after a considerable period of time.” The Plaintiff’s agent asked the Plaintiff’s agent to “e-mail that the construction work should have been carried out accordingly.”

However, although the complainant did not have any fact that he had settled at the construction site, the complainant did not request the design and other construction work in the Qaton Co., Ltd. which is the contractor of the board, the complainant testified against memory as above and raised perjury.

2. The plaintiff's agent's "the defendant requested an additional construction work without any initial contract statement, and the witness confirmed the burden of the additional construction cost from the defendant and instructed the plaintiff company to execute the construction work." The plaintiff's agent asked the plaintiff company to question "the cost of which KRW 2,456,200 was required."

However, although it was included in the original contract statement, the Corporation made a testimony contrary to memory as above and raised perjury.

3. The Plaintiff’s agent asked the Defendant to perform the additional construction of satisfy materials that were not originally written in the original contractual statement, and the witness confirmed the burden of the additional construction cost from the Defendant, and subsequently instructed the Plaintiff Company to perform the construction work, and the cost was incurred in KRW 4,000,000.

However, the satisfication corporation has testified against memory, although it was included in the original contract statement.