logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.03.25 2012가단210382
손해배상
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Summary of the cause of the instant claim

A. On November 6, 2002, the Defendant presented the Plaintiff at the Seoul District Court Decision 2001 High Court Decision 2001 High Court Decision 11009, the Defendant issued perjury by making a false statement contrary to memory as follows in the testimony after being sworn as a witness.

① Around January 12, 1999, the Defendant stated that “for example,” the prosecutor’s examination, “at the sixth floor conference room of the witness company, the president, the head of the E site, the witness, and the Defendant agreed to consult the unit price of KRW 160,000 per ton with the final price of KRW 1.60,000 per ton,” and that “for this reason, the witness described the content “1,60,000 won” in the first pledge form with the Defendant’s consent.”

② The Defendant stated that “A witness was subject to the C director’s cross-examination of the defense counsel’s cross-examination of the written estimate that “A witness is aware of the written estimate No. 275 of the investigation records of this written estimate,” and that “A witness was subject to the said written estimate.”

B. The Defendant appeared on December 12, 2003 at the Seoul District Court Decision 2003No7707 against the Plaintiff and testified after being sworn as a witness on December 12, 2003 by making a false statement contrary to memory as follows.

① At the court of first instance, the Defendant stated that “A witness testified that he/she would obtain a new quotation (in the face of No. 275 of the Investigation Records) in the name of the Defendant, and prepared a new draft (in the face of No. 270 of the Investigation Records)” as “e.g.,” and also stated that the said estimate should be received from C director,” respectively, as “e.g., whether he/she was examined from C director.”

2. The defendant takes a written oath (1) of 286 of the investigation records. The defendant takes a written oath of 286 of the investigation records.

arrow