beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On October 21, 2014, the Defendant appeared and testified at the court of Incheon District Court No. 322, the Incheon Southern-dong, Incheon District Court, as a witness of the case of violation of the Labor Standards Act against Defendant C of the above court No. 2014Da32756, Oct. 21, 2014. The criminal facts of the above case were that C did not issue a labor contract to E, who is an actual operator of the sports center of the trade name “D”, as the actual operator
The Defendant, not C, asserts that he is the actual operator of the above sports center, and the witness of the above attorney of the above case, stated that “e.g., the witness is not operating the sports center at the commercial building of this case” as “e.g., whether he is employed as a witness,” and stated “E is required to first prepare a labor contract and not prepare a labor contract” as “e.g., whether he would not prepare a labor contract by requesting the retired company to speak in writing the labor contract,” and “E did not notify the retired company of the employment of the fact that he was employed in the company of the fact that he was employed in the company.” As such, the Defendant stated “e.g., whether he would keep confidential the fact that he was employed in the company,” and “E did not prepare a labor contract” as “e.g., whether he would not prepare a labor contract by making confidential the fact that he was employed in the company without permission.”
However, the Defendant was merely a representative in the name of the above business establishment and did not actually operate the business establishment, and the Defendant did not employ the suspect once, and the Defendant requested C to prepare a labor contract through G, which is an employee of the above business establishment, but C did not prepare a labor contract, and it was not a dismissal of the GX program instructor under the direction of C, but E was not a unauthorized dismissal.
Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and presented perjury.