Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
【Criminal Records of Crimes】 On March 22, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for the crime of forging private documents at the Cheongju District Court’s Cheongju Branch on October 2, 2017, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 8, 2017.
【Criminal facts” at around December 2014, the Defendant: (a) committed an act as if he/she did not obtain permission from customers by advertising that he/she knew of his/her personal information; (b) prepared an application for subscription to a mobile phone in the name of customers and opened the mobile phone; and (c) had the intent to sell the core chip to D.
1. The Defendant, at the above “C” office around December 19, 2014, was in custody prior to the receipt of delegation from E to the opening of a cell phone or to the preparation of an application for joining a cell phone, even though he/she had not received delegation from E to the opening of a cell phone or to the preparation of an application for joining a cell phone.
The “E” column for “user information” column in the “application form for subscription to the Preliminary Telephone”, which was kept in the E’s name by using a copy of the identification card, stated “A” in the column “E’s resident registration number and address,” and stated “A” in the “date of application” column “the applicant or his/her agent,” and forged one copy of the “application form for subscription to the PPP telephone,” which is a private document concerning the rights and duties of another’s agent, using the Defendant’s signature on the next page, and forged one copy of the “application form for subscription to the PPP,” which is aware of the forgery on the same day, sent the “application form for subscription to the PP,” prepared as above, to an employee in the name of the head office of “PP,” as if the document was duly formed.
2. The Defendant, who forged a private document and carried out a falsified investigation document, was in custody in the office of the above “C” around December 19, 2014, and was in custody.
A copy of the identification card in the E name was kept at that place.