Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

[Majority Relationship] On April 9, 2015, Defendant B was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Northern District Court on April 9, 2015, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 17, 2015.

[2] No person, other than an attorney-at-law, may act as an agent in a litigation case in return for promising to receive money and valuables.

On July 201, 201, C made a call to Defendant A and filed a complaint with Defendant D and E on the fraud of KRW 300 million, and upon the substantive examination of D’s detention warrant, C asked Defendant A to be accompanied by his guardian as a guardian within the guardian within the guardian within the guardian in Israra, and Defendant A was aware of the contents of C’s case in detail in the process of accepting it and assisting C along with C.

After that, C asked Defendant A to receive an agreement against D and E, and instead, Defendant A attempted to reach an agreement on behalf of E, but it was not well good, and Defendant B calls to Defendant B to “I have any person who has any inconvenience and fraud while she is in the face of the face, and I would like to make the decision to grant C the decision.

Defendant B called “,” and Defendant B entered the case from a police officer, such as Defendant C, in the Song-gu Police Station, Seoul.

On July 27, 2011, the Defendants agreed to divide C with H and E, a representative of D, upon delegation of all acts related to the agreement of criminal cases against D and E, at the G coffee shop located in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul. After that, Defendant B agreed to divide C with H and E for the above agreement.

around November 29, 201, the Defendants received from C the delivery of KRW 30 million out of the above KRW 30 million out of the above KRW 30 million, and Defendant B received from C the delivery of KRW 6 million, respectively, in a criminal case agreement.

As a result, the Defendants are not attorneys-at-law.