logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.08.21 2014고정68
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant who violated the Attorney-at-Law Act is not a lawyer.

No one, other than an attorney-at-law, shall handle or promise to receive money, valuables, entertainment or other benefits, legal services, such as appraisal, representation, arbitration, reconciliation, solicitation, legal consultation or preparation of legal documents, with respect to a litigation case, an investigation case, etc. handled by an investigation agency or other general legal cases, or arrange such acts.

Around March 4, 2009, the Defendant: (a) had been aware of it from B (51 years of age, South) (51 years of age, South) and had been dissatisfied with C; (b) sought the statement that it is a matter of resolution and agreement; and (c) sought the statement that it is about the matter of resolution and agreement; and (d) sought to resolve the instant case to B well, and the same month.

5. The defendant's remittance of 200,000 won to the defendant's bank account in the name of school expenses to reach an agreement from B, and the same month;

6. A person who has been transferred a gold of 1.3 million won to the same account as additional activity expenses.

On March 9, 2009, the Defendant heard that C filed a complaint against injury to B, and filed a complaint against B. The Defendant made a complaint against the Defendant in the name of B with C at a place where the city of Gwangju or lower is unknown, and made a defective agreement between B and C around the 16th day of the same month to agree.

As a result, the defendant, not a lawyer, handled legal affairs such as the preparation of legal documents with respect to an investigation case in an investigative agency.

2. The fraud defendant around March 11, 2009, in the victim B's residence in Nam-gu, Gwangju Metropolitan City (D apartment 22 dong 1204), and even if he received money from the victim for the purpose of investment, he thought to be used as the defendant's debt repayment, etc., even if he did not have the intent or ability to generate profits or return the principal by investing in credit business, etc., the victim "at the time after he knows is running the credit business."

arrow