logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.09.24 2015고합392
사기등
Text

Imprisonment with prison labor for each crime provided for in paragraphs (1), (2) and (3) of the judgment of the defendant, and for each crime provided for in paragraph (4) of the judgment of the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On December 19, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Incheon District Court on January 28, 2014, and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 28, 2014, and completed the enforcement of the sentence at the Incheon Detention Center on August 20, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

1. No person, other than an attorney-at-law, shall handle legal services, such as appraisal, arbitration, settlement, solicitation, legal consultation, preparation of legal documents, etc. with respect to legal cases, in return for receiving or promising to receive money, etc.;

Nevertheless, the Defendant was aware of the fact that the husband D of the victim C committed a 100 million won fraud against E on June 26, 2014, who was detained by the Incheon District Court and was under criminal trial on June 26, 2014, that the victim’s husband D suffered difficulties in reaching an agreement with E during the criminal trial as the victim’s husband D and E, and was able to use the money for living expenses by receiving the money from the victim under the pretext of arranging agreement between the victim’s husband D and E so that it can be revoked in the above lawsuit.

On August 20, 2014, the Defendant received 200,000 won in total from the victim, as shown in the attached list of crimes, around nine times until August 28, 2014, upon receipt of the victim’s request for “E” agreement and withdrawal of complaint from the Incheon Southern-dong Incheon District Detention Center, and received 200,000 won in return for the expense and the withdrawal of complaint from the victim.

However, the defendant did not have a certain occupation and did not have any intention or ability to agree on behalf of the victim even if he received money from the victim due to lack of living expenses after release.

As a result, the defendant, not an attorney-at-law, handled reconciliation and other legal affairs concerning legal cases in exchange for money and other valuables, and, at the same time, deceiving the victim to acquire 10 million won from the victim.

2. At around 12:00 on September 17, 2014, the Defendant would have the victim F, “in the case of operating a consigned company, employed by him.”

arrow