logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.07.16 2015고정1995
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A summary of the Defendant who attempted to destroy and damage property at around 04:30 on May 2, 2015, in Incheon Nam-gu B

On the ground of the room, the victim D was found to find the test plastic paper (the defendant's statement that the cell phone is contained in the wall and the cell phone).

Accordingly, the victim considered CCTV and confirmed it.

The Defendant, at the time of the call of “drafing CCTV,” brought about 17 persons monitors a drinking time, but failed to do so without being damaged.

2. 폭행 피고인은 위 1항과 같은 일시 및 장소에서 피해자가 “왜 17인치 모니터를 주먹으로 치느냐 그러지 마세요, 조용히 있으세요”라고 말하자, “씹팔 좃팔 이 새끼 죽여버리겠다”고 욕을 하면서 피해자 D의 얼굴 부위를 머리 부위로 세차게 미는 폭행을 가하였다.

3. 업무방해 피고인은 위 2항과 같은 일시 및 장소에서 피해자에게 큰 소리로 “씹팔 좃팔 이 새끼 죽여버리겠다”고 욕을 하고, 때릴 듯이 주먹을 들고 폭행하는 듯 행동을 하였으며, 가요

In addition to the internal corridor, it was interfered with the operation of 10 minutes by putting about 10 minutes of happiness, making customers feel without calculating the internal corridor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. On-site reports;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 371 of the Criminal Act, Articles 371 and 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow