beta
Plaintiff, Appellant
Plaintiff
Defendant, appellant and appellant
Korea
Conclusion of Pleadings
June 11, 2015
The first instance judgment
Busan District Court Decision 2014Kadan18760 Decided December 17, 2014
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
3. Of the disposition of the first instance court’s judgment, Article 1(1) of the Nowon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Ordinance on the Aggravated Punishment, Etc., “Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-do Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City
Purport of claim and appeal
1. Purport of claim
It is confirmed that the shares of 15/1324, out of 57172 square meters of forests and fields, 57172 square meters of forests and fields are owned by the plaintiff.
2. Purport of appeal
The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;
The reasoning for the court's explanation concerning this case is the same as that for the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is cited in accordance with the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act
2. Conclusion
Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. However, as the "pro-North Korea's △△ Council" in paragraph (1) of the judgment of the court of first instance is obvious that it is a clerical error in the △△△ Council in the case of the Dong-won in North Korea-gun.
Judges' Profit-based(Presiding Judge) No. Gong50