The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant, as stated in the facts charged, did not forcibly commit an indecent act against the victim.

B. The punishment of the lower court is too heavy.

2. Determination

A. As to the assertion of mistake of facts, in a case where the statements made by the witnesses, including the victim, are mutually consistent and consistent with the facts charged, the court shall not reject such statements without permission, unless there is any other evidence that is objectively deemed to have no credibility (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 2004Do362, Apr. 15, 2005; 2012Do2631, Jun. 28, 2012) by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, comprehensively taking into account the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the court may recognize the fact that the victim’s right jum, while the defendant’s job, seems to be using the above part.

A) The victim stated consistently from the investigative agency to the court of the court below to the effect that “the Defendant was at the right her port while undergoing the beer publicity event,” and the victim made a statement in the investigative agency and the court of the court below to support the victim’s statement in support of the victim’s statement at the investigative agency and the court of the trial.

At the time, the victim-friendly I, who participated in the event team, also stated to the effect that “it was unable to directly witness the Defendant’s indecent act, but immediately after that, the Defendant took up the fact that the Defendant was her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her son.”

B) The defendant was under drinking together with the defendant at the time as the defendant's friendship.

J means that “the defendant is naturally aware of, and is memoryed by, the body of the defendant at his/her own seat” (Investigation Agency) and any inequality is all because the movement between the defendant and the net of his/her occurrence has been reduced, but it focuses on the act of protruding.