logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2014. 05. 29. 선고 2014두3259 판결
(심리불속행기각)토지가액 대비 수입금액 3% 미만의 주차장을 운영하여 비사업용토지에 해당함 [국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2013Nu23432 (Law No. 15, 2014)

Case Number of the previous trial

Seocho 2012west 4150 ( November 27, 2012)

Title

(P) A parking lot with less than 3% of the amount of income in comparison with the value of the land for non-business purposes is operated.

Summary

(In the original instance) It cannot be deemed that the parking lot does not fall under the business of operating the parking lot by operating less than 3% of the amount of the land value compared to the summary of the land value, which is related to the "resident" or which is not used for any purpose. Therefore, it shall not be deemed that one lot of land owned by one household who does not own a house is land excluded from the non-business land.

Related statutes

Scope of other lands used for the business under Article 168-11 of the Enforcement Decree of the Income Tax Act

Cases

2014Du3259 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

DoAA

Defendant-Appellee

Head of the tax office;

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2012Nu22579 Decided May 1, 2013

Imposition of Judgment

May 29, 2014

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds provided for in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Thus, the appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

arrow