A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 8, 2014, at around 20:46, the Defendant: (a) 112 reported and sent a 2001 Aring the 201string door in Gangdong-gu Seoul, Gangdong-gu, the Defendant: (b) Da, a police officer belonging to the Seoul Gangseo-dong Police Station B Zone B, who was called for “I am in person”; and (c) Doring the Defendant, “I am in person, I am in person, I am in person, who will am in person, with the knowledge that I am in person. I am in person, I am in person, so that I am in person.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reports and maintenance of order by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol law to C

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution [decision of the sentence] The sentence of the obstruction of performance of official duties [decision of the obstruction of performance of official duties/performance of official duties] Basic area / [decision of the recommended area] six months to one year and four months [decision of the sentence] [decision of the punishment of the recommendation area] reflectd nature of the crime, circumstances leading to the