logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2013.05.30 2013고정728
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The occupation of a private document comparison;

A. On June 14, 2012, the Defendant, without authority, forged one copy of a new service contract, which is a private document on the rights and obligations of the E’s name, entered “E”, “F”, “E”, “E”, and “G” in the account number column in the name column of a new service contract kept therein, without authority, for the purpose of exercising the authority.

B. At around 15:30 on July 4, 2012, the Defendant, without authority, forged one copy of a new service contract under the name of “H”, “I”, “E”, and “G”, which are private documents concerning the rights and obligations of H’s name, in the name column of a new service contract kept there, without authority, for the purpose of exercising the same at the place under the preceding paragraph.

2. The holding of the relevant investigation document;

A. The Defendant, at the same time, at the same time and place as paragraph 1(a), delivered a false service contract under the name of E, which was forged, to C, as if it were a document duly formed.

B. The Defendant, at the same time, at the same time and place as Paragraph 1(b), delivered the same new contract under the name of H, which was forged, to C, as if it were a document duly formed.

3. The point of holding unlawful official documents; and

A. The Defendant, at the same time, at the same place and place as paragraph (1) of paragraph (1) of this Article, presented to C a resident registration certificate under the name of the head of Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, the official document, as if he had a legitimate authority to open a Handphone, and exercised it as if he was the Defendant’s resident registration certificate.

B. The Defendant has a legitimate authority to open a Handphone in H’s name, where the Defendant took place at the same time, place, as referred to in paragraph 2(a), and where he took place as he or she was E and makes a false statement as his or her early car.

arrow