The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the reasons for appeal (one year of the suspended sentence of six months, one year of the suspended sentence of imprisonment, and 80 hours) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment that the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case and divided the wrong facts in depth, and that the defendant is the first offender who has no criminal history should be considered in favor of the defendant.

However, the crime of this case is a forged test report on the company in which the defendant worked, which is the quality test report in the name of the Korean electrical researcher, and the illegality of the act is heavy.

In particular, considering the fact that the results of the issuance of the Institute as a national authorized testing research institute for electric equipment have high credibility and that the crimes such as the crime of this case are highly likely to cause other damage such as defective construction works, it is necessary to strictly punish the defendant.

In addition, the sentencing of the lower court is not deemed unfair because it is too big, considering the various circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, intelligence and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime.

The defendant's ground of appeal cannot be accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.