1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On February 25, 2011, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea with the visa exemption (B-1) status on February 25, 201, and obtained permission for change on April 13, 201, and was staying in the Republic of Korea upon obtaining permission for extension of the sojourn period (F-4) after obtaining permission for change of sojourn status on overseas Koreans (F-1, 201).

B. However, on February 6, 2015, the Plaintiff paid 10 percentage 200 to the Seoul Central District Court (2014Gohap1518) on the Habn on January 6, 2014, and made the Plaintiff arrive at the Incheon International Airport from the Netherlands Rotterdam on February 2014. On March 23, 2014, the Plaintiff paid 30 percentage 17 percentage 200 to the Habnman on March 23, 2014, and imported marijuana from the Netherlands to the Incheon International Airport on April 23, 2014, and smoked from the Habn on February 2014, the lower court was sentenced to suspended sentence of imprisonment for violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (hereinafter referred to as the "mathn on February 3, 2014").

C. On March 17, 2015, the Defendant was subject to criminal punishment as above and subject to deportation under the Immigration Control Act, but imposed a disposition ordering the Plaintiff to leave the Republic of Korea until April 15, 2015 (hereinafter “instant disposition”) by applying Articles 11(1)3 and 4, 46(1)3, and 68(1)1 of the Immigration Control Act, taking into account the Plaintiff’s intent of voluntary departure, etc.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, 3, 4, and 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff alleged that the Plaintiff committed the above crime for personal consumption under the circumstance that the Plaintiff’s assertion was committed by a company working in around 2013 that did not extend the contract. The said crime was one-time act of smoking the small amount of marijuana purchased, and the Plaintiff led to confession and reflects the above criminal facts.